The topic about transforming universities into training grounds for job opportunities has elicited intense arguments over the years. Traditionally, institutions of higher learning had the mandate to equip students with knowledge and education (Vernez, Krop, & Rydell, 1999). However, the evolving nature of the job market counters the core objective of the universities. A majority of employers prefer hiring candidates with sufficient working knowledge and experience. Therefore, the transition of graduates to the job market has become a herculean task.
The curriculum in the universities should integrate vocational and employment training to improve the employability of the graduates. The incredible amounts of money spent by employers on training workers are a worrying trend. In the modern business world, commercial entities are developing efficient strategies to minimize their costs. However, the production of well-trained individuals from the universities who possess a combination of educational and vocational skills reduces the training costs significantly (Jedding, 2010). In the past, a university education acted as a gateway to a bright future and endless opportunities in life. The norm has changed over the years due to the amount of people e seeking higher learning to better their lives. In essence, Vernez et al. (1999) believe the university education has lost its once robust socioeconomic value. In the job market, there exists intense competition for the few available jobs.
Perfect employability and soft skills give a candidate a competitive edge. However, most employers are complaining about the competence of the graduates produced by universities in the present day era. Besides the academic qualification, Jedding (2010) contends that the potential employees lack the interpersonal and employability skills. In conclusion, a new dimension in the education system, therefore, offers a perfect remedy to this debacle. Regardless, university education is still vital as it bolsters creativity and analytical skills.